I also do not believe BA should get their ranking and rewards based on what was done through RMT by their leadership. I would argue that because the guild leaders decided to RMT, it's strategy for RMT impacted the difficulty of scoring season points for their guild. Since most of the season, their points they earned were uncontested, I believe their strategy for denying content so they can RMT more in the BZ had a significant role to play on them getting first place.
Most of the season points BA got were uncontested during the season. Mass allying their competition and cluster queuing zones with a "anything to win" type of strategy is generally not what players who play games for fun would do. If not for pushing an ulterior motive like making RL money, this strategy of denying BZ content would not be as effective and score them so many uncontested season points. I would argue that BA go out of their way to deny content, because it helps them generate more silver for them to RMT. It just so happens that mass allying their competitors, and cluster queuing zones until their competition quit the game just happens to make it easier for them to get #1 in the season. Since most of the points earned were uncontested, they don't deserve the rank and rewards for the season for breaking this rule.
The big enemy coalitions did contest our territories but failed on the zvz events so they couldn't get our storaged points generated by our territories that were raided 24h7 btw.
Six alliance that is divided into two (one north and one south) were ratting our outpost and castles at every timer wich made us forced to reclaim all of those at every timer thanks to our solo flippers.
Your statement also implies that BA paid real life money to everyone that we allied and that helped us trough this war and season wich in itself is a RMT accusation without proof and is a bannable offense as you're accusing other players of RMT or accepting real life money as a trade without providing any proof to your statement.
As previously said in another post : "At this point you are a philosopher, whose central idea is cheating. Everything can be explained with it, and everything can be related to it, and it becomes the main means to justifying whatever you want to deem unjust/evil, etc.
And I am mildly amused by the fact that you conveniently missed my post, which was giving you a well formulated argument from straight up, fact-checkable SBI standpoints, and the community effort made by an overwhelming postion of the BA/F guild folks, who had no knowledge of who and if were RMT-ing. Just let me add here, when BA folks knew that there was RMT aboard, they reported it. It is not a wildly known fact, but when Durateen (who is likely the reason behind banning the leaders for assisting known RMTers) actually played in the guild, he was indeed reported by BA members multiple times, until he fully disappeared, and noone knew his characters anymore.
What you are doing is literally the same thinking that, if a building block is known for a weed dealer who has access to it, then all the homes can be raided every time weed is found in the vicinity. If BA is still the proverbial enemy to you knowing this, you are delusion"